|
|
Some of the most insightful writing about the American character
over the nation’s history has been about neither freedom nor democracy
but about the crazed impulse to acquire things. A century ago Thorstein
Veblen wrote “The Theory of the Leisure Class,” coined the term
“conspicuous consumption” and shocked his countrymen with the notion
that the pride they took in their prosperity was the most primitive form
of snobbery and self-doubt. He concluded that the buying habits of most
Americans owed little to need and much to wanting “the esteem and envy
of one’s fellow-men.” Shopping even 100 years ago was about
insecurity, the determination to exhibit superiority through gilt and
cut glass, sterling spoons and spreading skirts.
Fast-forward to the present,
and, despite what is described as a depressed retail climate, Veblen
would feel utterly at home. There are still plenty of people buying
cashmere sweaters and electronic gadgets, although the sweater drawer is
full and the old VCR still blinks 12:00. But the urge to splurge today
is more complex, Juliet Schor, a Harvard economist, writes in “The
Overspent American.” When the term “keeping up with the Joneses”
first came into vogue, what it meant was staying even with the most
affluent family in the neighborhood, a goal that was often within reach.
According to Schor, television has meant keeping up with more remote and
richer Joneses: the furniture on “MTV Cribs” or the home-design
shows, the clothes of Will and Grace and Katie and Matt. For most
viewers that’s impossible, but they will go into debt trying.
There have been endless
holiday pieces written about the bizarre chasm between the birth of a
baby whose parents couldn’t even get a room, much less a suite with a
phone in the bathroom, and the annual ritual of wild-eyed buying of
items that, come Dec. 26, seem beside the point. “Joy to the World”
notwithstanding, Christmas shopping has become a joyless, even hateful
pursuit. |
|